Group rehearsal-Week 3

09/06/2021 with Zoe, Jo, Helena, Jan-Ming (online)

1) Today we worked with compression forces. In partners, applying a force to our partner giving a direction into the body. Then observe how the body reacts and comes back to its original shape, following the laws of tensegrity: the force us transmitted throughout the whole structure, the architecture resists you, wether you bend, push or twist, it naturally counter any movement by stiffening… (Yoga by Avison, 2015)

What I call compression as it is a term used in massage therapy and in tensegrity: when 2 oppositional forces go towards each other, in opposition to tensional forces where the forces go away from each other.

‘The compression exercise makes me go in spirals as a way of compensating. I feel the edge of my contours, and the resilience that allows to bounce back instead of collapsing.’

We both used hands and the whole body as a structure

Outcome:

There is a sense of buoyancy, coming back to the original shape or structure. It is about tuning into the spread of the forces through the body and into the floor.

When a force is applied in 1 direction, the body will naturally create helixes and rotations as a response.

We found out that in order to have compression forces, there need to be the resistance of the ground that acts in the opposite direction. Are these forces then called shearing forces? Where they go in opposite direction but are not aligned? I decided to keep the term compression force because it gives a sense of going towards the body, and these are made in relation with gravity.

 

2) Jan-Ming was working online with a stick, then a pilates ball, as compressional elements

Outcome:

‘Since I was working remotely, online, and was not in the studio with the other dancers, I worked with objects, rather than humans.

Working with a short wooden stick held by both ends between my right shin and my left upper arm…I felt the sensation of the soft tissues around my shin and the bulge of my arm flesh; its angles, its tonal qualities. I felt the edges of the stick, like a massage tool, also like some kind of communication portal; a phone line or an internet wire; sending signals between my arm and my shin tissues.

Nudging gently, quickly, pausing, back and forth so that the stick stayed in contact with my flesh contact points… too forceful or too gentle and the stick would fall. Perhaps like listening to another person, and feeling their essence; their personality; their capacity in this moment to speak about a certain topic; it was like a listening of resilience and playfulness between the two characters – my ‘arm’ and my ‘lower leg’.

The rest of my bones echoed the structure of the stick; so precise and defined in its limits. I moved my fascia as if moving my whole self around my bones, to stay in dialogue with this stick. The sound of the stick loudly clattered as it fell to the floor.

The gym-ball was my second partner that I worked with… Its tone also greatly defined the relationship I had with it.  I felt like I needed to create much more variation in the tone in my body to stay in dialogue with it.

I created many ‘stations’ in my body where I could be aware of how the force from the contact of the gymball could run through my body, to continue spreading the motion through my whole awareness, and through the gym-ball.’

3) We finished with exploring the architecture of the space and the objects occupying the space, while still digesting the tasks on compression

Outcome:

We noticed how the compressional elements of the building and objects (table, bench…), were mostly regular and flat. Most of us moved in contrast to these structures: including spiraling movement, breath, curved path…

‘I feel invisible strings in the space pulling me in different directions, spiraling in and out of the surfaces of the space’

Question: how would it be to move within a biotensegral architecture?

 

11/06/2021 Site visit: All Along The Watch Tower byProject Bunny Rabbits

Dancing around tensegrity structures being constructed by a group of volunteers (project Bunny Rabbits, winners of Antepavillon 2021- https://www.antepavilion.org/2021-winner)

Similar structures have been used as part of the movement Extinction Rebellion, as a way to protest against climate change, declaring a climate emergency posing a threat to our planet. Most of the volunteers today are part of the extinction rebellion movement. 

The structures represent strong but agile and mobile structures that can be build quickly and unmounted.

Tensegrity in this way is used as a political statement, denouncing structures in place and offering alternatives ways of protesting. This is what the collective says: ‘The beacons embody the characteristics necessary in guerrilla style confrontation with authority: agility, flexibility, adaptability, transportability, and security. They are instruments of nonviolent direct action in the face of encroaching authoritarianism.’

Made out of bamboo, a light but strong wood, representing the compressional element of the tensegrity structure, and cables in continuous tension holding the structure, representing the tensional element of the tensegrity structure. 

It is very clear how the bamboo poles are floating in the structure. 

Outcome and experience :

My body feels lighter dancing around the structure called the ‘cloud’ , especially where the poles of bamboo are floating in the air.

It mirrors back the floating bones inside our tensional soft tissue network.

To move one element engages the whole floating structure to move in a light bouncy way. 

Where the structure is more sturdy and stable, my body feels more rigid, and wants to climb.

The way the poles are floating, they are crossing each other in a 3 dimensional way. The cables are either forming triangles or hexagons. This once more reflects back on the awareness of my body and my inner space as a 3 dimensional structure. 

In Ideokinesis, the mental picture we have of ourselves conditions and shapes us. So to use images and metaphors for the body can help us perceive ourselves differently. The same way, our environment shapes us. 

In the edited book the Sentient Archive, Juhani Pallasmaa writes about buildings: ‘They also serve to structure our view of the world and enable us to dwell in the world through providing cultural, metaphorical, and symbolic meanings as well as a domicile for our memories, dreams and fears.’ (Bissell, Caruso Haviland, 2018, p. 49-50).

The way I engage with the tensegrity structure makes me perceive my body as a light efficient structure that responds to stress and can adapt.

The politics of tensegrity:

In order to construct the structure the volunteers have to work collaboratively. Their interaction is a dance in itself. 

While they move and mount the structure, their bodies becomes forces of transmission as well as extension of the tensegrity structure: either pulling or pushing , using the whole body and the grounding of the earth as an extension of the structure. There is no heavy lifting that engages the old concept of biomechanics : understanding the body and joints as levers. 

The whole group works as a collaborative entity where there is listening and observing of each other, because if someone pushes one direction, the whole structure responds. The bodies become interconnected through the play of the structure. 

 

11/06/2021 Rehearsal Maya, Tara and Olivia 

Today we focus on the visco-elastic aspect of the fascia, in other words the quality of the fascia that has the ability to change viscosity, either hardening or become more like jelly depending on its use and the forces of tension that goes through it. 

1) We explore various layers of fascia: the superficial fascia just under the dermis, and the deeper fascia. To access the superficial fascia, we apply contact skin to skin, find a sticking point and find the slide of tissue taking place. To get to the deeper layers of fascia, I use my knowledge as a massage therapist: we sink into the skin to enter the fascial web, and instead of sliding we apply some shearing forces. Dancers were free to explore both.

We partner with ourselves, the floor or the walls.

Outcomes:

‘I feel my skin like an old bag, a container. I feel the age of this bag that is elastic but has lost some of its elasticity. It is sometimes slack. While sliding and shearing, I feel my skin is like a thick T-shirt being pulled and stretched. The exploration connects me to the tactile sense, that resonates also when I interact with the space.’

The dancers observe different types of textures and flexibility depending on body parts: the knees have more slack, the top of the feet too, in comparison to the sole of the feet. 

There is a tugging feeling that can be both felt and seen: when pulling the superficial fascia of the thigh upwards, we can observe the ripple effect in the shin and the foot. 

 

2) Inspired by the tensegrity structure and the floating bamboos, we worked with the image of floating bones suspended in our soft tissue. Then floating bones inside the space. 

Outcomes:

Pete finds a deeper connection to the core, and recognition of his own structure and his architecture. The choices feel more intuitive and responsive, in comparison to the rehearsal in week 1, based on the score of fascial awareness between each other. 

3) Improvising with the image of the connective tissue between us. Not focusing on our movement but rather on the space between.Based on Helena’s comment in week 2: ‘to include someone in your kinesphere is like expanding your proprioception’ (02/06/2021) , we work with keeping each other in our proprioceptive awareness. 

Outcome: 

The space becomes instantaneously more dynamic. The energy is more incisive, going into the space, loosing some of the soft jelly space we explore before in 1). A sense of playfulness emerges.

 

4) Elastic band and specialization 

Score: Making elastic bands as loops to connect the dancers, keeping the continuous tension between them. The dancers are inside the elastic loop.

Outcomes:

While playing in this continuous network of elastic tension, one dancer tends to lead more whereas the rest of the group has to follow. 

So we decide emphasize this tendency and go with it rather than ignoring it. 

I guess this is what I would call non-homogenous harmony, where the whole group is interdependent and has to adjust and adapt. If one element is less in the listening, then the other elements have to adapt and are responsible to keep the continuous tension.

This non-homogeneity reminds me of two parts of anatomy and physiology that are related:

  • embryology and how cells differentiate and specialize. In reference to the video becoming, by the filmmaker Jan van Ijken (https://vimeo.com/316043706), where we can clearly observe the formation, subdivision and specialization of cells that takes place in the genesis of an alpine newt.
  • Wolff’s law says that bone remodels depending on the load it experiences. This process is linked to the mechano-transduction we explored in week 2 on 04/06/21, score 3. According to Wolff’s law, bone formation, growth and remodeling will depend on the forces that is applied to it. For example when there is more compression forces transmitted, the bone will start to lay down osteoblasts and create more bone, making it more dense. On the opposite, when there is lack of compression or load, bone will loose its density and can become more fragile. We have the example of astronauts sent in space, after a while they loose their bone density because they don’t experience the gravitational forces.

In the same way we explored tensional forces through the elastic bands, we experienced how the change in tension affects the whole group and start o create a pattern.

Jan-Ming’s experience with the stick at the beginning of the week (09/06- 2)), is another testament of this inner organization taking place:

‘The rest of my bones echoed the structure of the stick; so precise and defined in its limits. I moved my fascia as if moving my whole self around my bones, to stay in dialogue with this stick.’

Pete played with mini elastic between his fingers and toes. The rest of the body reacting. 

 

Comments

  • Zoë Solomons

    June 12, 2021 at 4:55 pm

    Working with the concept of compression got me curious about what we mean by compression when we’re thinking and touching.
    I did some reading and thinking and here are my reflections and explorations:
    In physics and biomechanics compression is described as inward force —> I_____I <— . This requires a force and an opposing force in order that whatever is between is compacted or squashed, to use an more visual word. You could say that when we stand our mass compresses itself relative to the floor resisting it, or that as we breathe out the elastic recoil of our cylindrical rib basket compresses the air and our lung tissue in our lungs.
    When someone puts their hands either side of our rib basket and squeezes they are compressing us. If they just put one hand and press, how much compression (squashing) occurs will depend on how much resistance or opposing force is given. When we massage someone lying on a couch and we press directly down we are applying compression and that body cannot move away. When we apply that same force to a standing body the amount of resistance that person chooses to respond with will define the level of compression that occurs.
    If no resistance is offered i imagine a small amount of compression may occur due to the inherent resistance created by inertia. Once the part of the body being pressed moves sideways the force has been transformed into Translation. Here’s where more choice shows up: the body’s joints and tissues have shortest range when moving mono-axially so if that compressive force is translated and maintained in one direction the body will quickly come to end of range and become compromised. This compromise comes from Shearing -when the bit moving sideways pulls on the bits either side of it and there is no more give. At this point we might at that integrity or Biotensegrity of the body has been reduced or lost. So how wee coordinate our body parts in response to compressive force is important to avoid injury.
    Tissues have most range in tri-axial motion. triaxial motion as an efficient means of channeling momentum through matter appears in all natural forms from DNA to trees to sea waves to collagen in our myofascia.
    Maries invitation seemed to be to explore recreated triaxial undulation: waves of triaxial movement, as a way of experiencing this complex displacement and the rebound that occurs as tissues recoil from impulse.
    What my partner and i noticed when we did the “tensegrity responding to pressure” exercise was that our bodies took the linear compressive force and dispersed it through our tissues with tri-axial motion. It reminded us of material arts exercise “pushing hands” where one partner disperses hand pressure by fluid flowing movement. We spent quite a lot of time sensing into the levels of tension and resistance in our bodies and the complexity of options in response to compressive force, and the different physical effects that this had. It appeared to us that the triaxial accommodation of our partners pressure led fluidly to helical movement which brought us to a different orientation together. This offered a new position in which to initiate a push.

    Here are some useful sources on some of these terms:
    https://musculoskeletalkey.com/6-basic-biomechanics/#para37
    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-5298-4_1

  • Pete Guy Spencer

    June 18, 2021 at 5:15 pm

    ad: Rehearsal #6 – 11-06-2021
    Fascia explorations with self and floor showed that not only have the knees and buttocks the highest fascial flexibility, but also the outer/upper side of the hands/feet more flexibility than the palm/sole of the hands/feet. Working the fascia of the deeper levels evoked a crunching sound and feel and felt quite unpleasant at the visceral fascia of the belly organs.
    I sense that every structural change leads to stretching/releasing of fascial fibers => my connecting with the space now also reaches a deeper layer / core level (it’s no longer solely a “reaching out” of limbs as in rehearsal #1) => this leads to recognizing patterns and shapes in the other dancers and in the architecture on an inside/intuitive/responsive level that goes beyond mere imitation – as if I was building my own structure in the structures experienced/observed
    Later on (score 2) I feel my bones as if swimming and fluorescent, connected to the architecture and/or other dancers in focus.
    In score 4 I reenact the group’s elastic bands duets and trios with small elastic bands between my fingers and toes, keeping tension, sensing different elasticity (of the bands) and my tensegrally floating fingers. Through the screen the size feels like a reversal: the dancers with their long elastic bands tied together are quite tiny for me whereas my hands with the household elastic bands look huge.
    Being an observer/witness also through the screen I experience more playfulness when the elastic bands of the dancers are knotted and they are inside a loop, but the image/structure appears to be stronger and the dancers’ movements somewhat more ‘convincing’ when they hold the bands in their hands.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *